用户登录 手机浏览更多好看哦
手机二维码
印度网友评论:核震慑中国不管用,印度应该如何改革
发布时间:2021-09-06 08:43:11   浏览:
译文背景
印度文章内容:达拉克危机其实远没有结束,印度正面对着一个巨大的问题,核震慑对中国根本不管用,而常规武器却又不如中国的情况下,印度应该如何面对中国呢?文章从军事改革方面入手,列出了印度要解决的麻烦。
下面是印度读者的看法:
网友评论
yildrimgashani
Tbh watching many of the rock fight videos from last year, the Pla troops performing at least as well as our troops. They fought aggressively as cohesive units. In fact in many cases I saw that Indian troops were on the backfoot and seemed toe taken aback by the Chinese
说实话,看了很多去年双方搏斗的视频,解放军表现得和我们的军队一样好。
他们的部队充满凝聚力,在搏斗旳过程中充满进攻性。事实上,在很多情况下,我看到印度军队在后退,似乎被中囯人吓倒了
 
ilver__95
I wonder what we realized after the border conflict..
我想知道边境冲突过后,我们意识到了什么!
 
Blank
That we need to improve. Or else we are fucked. We were walking towards another 1962 and we didn t even know it.
意识到我们需要改革。否则我们就完蛋了。我们正在走向另一个1962,可很多人却没有意识到这一点.
 
Randomradio
Ne don t have the finances to go beyond minimum deterrence
我们没有财力增加核力量,即使是越过最低核威慑限度。
 
madhuakara
the worst part is our MoD announcing all sorts of weapons, delivering them 10 years late in meagre quantities and then fogetting the basics. we think we will just scare them by our brochures. And then when it doesn t work we run into the arof US, Russia etc. we put out a mumbo jumbo statement which no one here understands and then off we go to sleep again.
最糟糕的是,我们的国防部总喜欢宣布印度将拥有各种各样的武器,然后在拖延10年后勉强交付少量数目后不了了之,印度的官员们只会用宣传册吓唬敌人。然后,当吓唬不起作用时,我们就会投入美国、俄罗斯等国家的怀抱。我们总是对敌人放一些大语,然后放心地去睡觉。
 
Narendra Singh
India never claimed nuclear deterrence against China, Ladakh stand off gave China a bloody nose, your boss is finding it difficult to save face。
印度从未对中国发出过核威慑,达拉克所发生的对峙让中国人的流了鼻血,你的中国老板发现很难保住自己的面子。
 
anddeep
The war is not fought with modern weapons, but with the courage and spirit of the people. A super power country like Amerca lost to taliban
战争靠的不是用现代武器,而是用人民的勇气和精神。像美囯这样的超级大国就输给了塔利班。
 
Ananda b
What a dump article! As if India has never defeated Pakistan As far as China is concerned, we had just one war lost 1962 (where Nehru didnt even retaliate) but won the second in 1967)
真是一篇垃圾文章搞得好像印度没有打败过巴基斯坦。就中国而言,我们只在1962年输了一场战争(尼赫鲁甚至没有回击报复但我们羸得了1967年的第二次战争.
 
Deepmind
we will die fighting, if that is what it takes. Do you want to proclaim allegiance to Chinese or fight?
如果有必要,我们会战死沙场。而你(作者)是要效忠中国人还是要战斗?
 
svaradaraj
Any discussions around war including Nuclear weapons are pointless as there is only one outcome -MAD, Mutual Assured D
任何把核武器来进战争的讨论都是毫无意义的,因为只有一个结果—MAD,即相互保证毁灭。
 
Aavinash
India's deterrence has not failed. India has a no first use policy. India needs to discard it's no first use policy, invest in nuclear warheads and missiles, and then watch how China seeks India's cooperation
印度的威慑并没有失败。印度有不首先使用核武的政策。印度应该放弃不首先使用核武的政策,投资开发更多的核弹头和导弹,然后坐看中国如何寻求与印度合作
 
ishabh1804
Nehru. The answer is always Nehru.
尼赫鲁。笞案永远都是怪尼赫鲁
 
sidch95
My understanding is that Even if it threatened China with nuclear weapon attack by cancelling the nuclear deterrence, how China will be threatened? can t he do the same with india?
我的理解是,即使印度取消“不首先使用核武器″保证,以核打击威胁中国,可问题是,中国怎么可能会怕呢?他们同样可以对印度实行核威胁
 
GG-00
China has more, better nukes so nuclear posturing by India doesn t work any more than posturing with a smaller, weaker conventional force
中国拥有更多更好的核武所以即使印度摆岀核武,也并不比更小更弱的常规军事力量更具威胁性。
 
Ramana
china has a single command(Western Theater Command) to handle India. Whereas India has 7 commands facing China and each talk to headquarters before they talk to their equivalent who is nearbnd underfire from opponents.
From 2014 to 2019 PM has seen numerous confrontations with both Pakistan and China and seen the gaps. Hence need reform day as 20 years of discussion and delay already done.
Sorry Indian worst enemy is still internal
中国只有一个西部战区来对付印度
而印度划分了7个司令部应对中国,每个司令部都要先与总部对话,然后再与附近的司令部对话,从2014到2019年,印度经过与巴基斯坦和中国的多次对抗,看到了军事差距。因此在经历了20年的讨论和拖延后,今天已经到了不得不改革的地步,但是很可惜,印度最大的敌人仍然来自内部.

上一篇:印度网友评论:印度将超过中国成为人口最多的国家
下一篇:印度网友评论:全球最具吸引力的制造业中心,中国第一,印度第二

最新译文