A true world leader would invite everyone to participate in its space station while a loser would ban others from not even their own space station
T'suy levs k
Are You talking about American
@Tsuy levs kyy We all know that??
See what happens when you ban China
NASA: stop working with China. Don't share ISS with China,China : No problem. We will figure it out and build one.
still remem ber the United States shamelessly talked to China a few years ago, and exchanged open space stations and relited technologies for our quantum technology From Shenzhou 1 to Shenzhou 12, wherever there is a shadow of American techlogy, our researchers are struggling step by step. Coming Russia still has technological research, and Russia gave a lot of guidance on the rocket engine. The engine is still strong in Russia. The United States is still buying the rocket engie developed by Russia 3o years ago
Many people say that the appearance is very similar, so I would like to ask whether the appearance must be American and Rssian technology? How could they share technology with China, the space station is dominated by the United States and Rusia, and China has not been allowed to join. China has gone step by step to the present and is self-reliant China seems have news of cooperation with the European Space Agency
Bear in mind that most China haters are uneducated people. Broad-minded individuals honour cooperation for the benefit o
Kali skun kog
Chinese people are calculated and disciplined. Bravo
hinese space station certainly looks more modern, more spacious and more liveable than the other one. Well done China ?
sS literally an orbital junkyard, the inside is so untidy and looks horrendous.
One True morty
h, the russian part of the ISs looks about the same, just older.
Im.ISS is over 20 years old, are you sure you are doing a fair comparison?
@JOhn Lau it's always interesting to compare. for the news modules of SSI for exemple: they need a medical quarter w
ith a doctor, a mess, a fitness room, greenhouses
@JOhn Lau ISS built by 15 countries, while this one is built by only one country, hows that? Do you think it's fair?
More modern?1? It's based on 1970s USSR technology, just like their entire space program. The airlock door looks like so
nething from a 1920's submarine
We rape everything that move We rape
Who can defeat Chinese student in physics chemistry science and mathematics?
anony me l
yeees, but it's interesting too because you have probably another safety systems
Don' t be so superficial
just like moving into a new house, it's always spacio
anony me l
@Bernard Lim yes but everybody don't like accumulator some things, and if you have two stations for the same work it will be a good point for the both with a good cooperation.
well the US don' t really like upgrading the old one as it is costly (no benefit whatsoever, as no money is gained ) Justlook at their nuclear reactors. old version and inefficient. plus the chinese one is brand new
Not really fair to compare them. The ISS is 2 decades old with most of it's module being over a decade old
Of course it is, the ISS is 24 years old, they literally started building it in the late 2oth century.
that's the inner door not the outer door, or are you seeing too much sci-fi movie and think it looks like star trek?
Its a very tough jobs, they are supposed to work nonstop 3days to carry out various tasks.
seeing from the back of the technicians jumpsuit in the launch tower, I think China has adopted the American term insteaof course Taikongnaut will be cool